InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 37
Posts 7064
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 09/06/2014

Re: guardiangel post# 29148

Sunday, 04/19/2015 9:01:32 AM

Sunday, April 19, 2015 9:01:32 AM

Post# of 30046
A 2010 PR takes precedent over NOTHING that came later.

Radient released a lot of PR's about things that never happened. The CIT Phase II and Phase III studies never happened, not in India, not anywhere in the world. Nobody developed, worked on, tested, or studied CIT after Radient declared CIT worthless on December 31, 2011.

The PPS of Radient spiked because of a certain "analyst" saying positive things about Radient in April and December 2010, causding a short squeeze each time. The hype PR's about CIT studies and Mayo Studies and Monetization of Jade and Monetization of NuVax might have helped a little, but the catalyst for the price spikes in April and December 2011 was the short squeeze caused by "analysis" written by a certain "analyst."

It is that simple. Unfortunately, everything that "analyst" said about Radient proved to be 100% wrong, which means the PPS eventually returned to the level at which it belonged.

Guardiangel, you say this "analyst" is your "friend?" Have you asked him whether he wants us to discuss and debate his 2010 and 2011 "analysis" on a message board? I bet he does not want any of that "analysis" discussed or debated today. I think it makes that "analyst" look like a criminal or an idiot, but that is just my opinion of course.




Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.