InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 140
Posts 11663
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/15/2011

Re: pphmtoolong post# 215726

Thursday, 04/16/2015 11:31:55 AM

Thursday, April 16, 2015 11:31:55 AM

Post# of 346050
pphmtoolong, that COULD have been true but I need only ONE SINGLE phrase to demonstrate the opposite.

Bavi+Doce Breast Cancer. See results and and ASCO reports between 2007 and 2010. And then PPHM starts a Bavi+Doce in NSCLC with the breast interims still fresh in the markets memory.

Here is even one from a year earlier, 2009 straight from cj: Bavi-Doce Interim Results

Since you started with a wrong statement I didn't read the rest any more.

There was no motive for a 3rd party to launch the conspiracy


And in my opinion there was NO CONSPIRACY at all. The sabotage is a single party driven initiative. Those participating in its execution will have had NO PERSONAL motive except for the incentives that have been offered.

So if JB was part of it then I start from the assumption she had NO PERSONAL reason to do it but 3rd party incentive.

PS: AbbVie also didn't know the NEW Bavi MOA understanding when they wanted to partner with PPHM.

Peregrine Pharmaceuticals the Microsoft of Biotechnology! All In My Opinion. I am not advising anything, nor accusing anyone.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent CDMO News