Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (MNTA)

[biopearl]

Re Amphastar, from pacer.gov: 04/03/2015 87 Response to oral argument order from the Appellees Actavis Pharma, Inc., Actavis, Inc., Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and International Medication Systems, Ltd.. designating Pratik A. Shah as arguing attorney. Designated time for argument: 15 minutes. Designated time for rebuttal: 0 minutes. Service of other counsel by Notice of Docket Activity from this entry. [229397]

No rebuttal from Sandoz/MNTA? Is it usual to have an oral argument on one side and a Docket on the other? Is this unusual? Just curious or am I perhaps not reading this correctly. Regards, bp