I-GLOW, No, it's not a case of ignoring these questions.
"A few simple questions that shareholders seem to ignore".
Not when you post these points a couple of hundred times. We're well aware of these things. After the first 100 times, no one really cares or wants to see it again. Repeating it ad nauseam is not going to change anything, it's only going to cause everyone to tune you out. Eventually it becomes very annoying.
You posted:
Why is the TA gagged?
Why did GRCU promise on November 19 2014 to be fully reporting by the first quarter in 2015 but oddly still haven't hired a auditor?
If GRCU didn't pay & 20,000 for a paid promotion - why didn't they issue a press release stating that the stock was being manipulated.
Why did GRCU promise a $4 million dividend and never deliver.
Why did GRCU promise it had $3 million investment from a mysterious offshore investor and once again not deliver?
These are all classic share selling scheme tactics.
I don't have an answer to those questions. No one does. It could be due to a combination of things; making promises they never should have made; not being far enough ahead as far as revenues are concerned to be able to hire an auditor. It takes money, and we can see they don't have much money right now.
As far as the gagged T/A, this was TTDZ's T/A. When GRCU took over, they inherited that T/A. It was most likely a lot easier to leave things the way they were, then to go out and hunt down a T/A and go through the process of using them. Could they have changed to another T/A? Sure they could have. They probably should have. But if you already have a T/A in place, why bother? From what I know, David has never been in this business before. He's not familiar with all this stuff. There is a very good chance that he had never heard what a 'share selling scheme' was. He just wanted to start a company and be successful. There is a T/A already in place. Good. Why change? This is just as plausible as your explanations. So who's right and who's wrong?
Up to now, the one big thing it does lack (to suggest that it is a share selling scheme) is the 'wash, rinse and repeat' process. I see very little movement in the their O/S. What movement there is, they are reporting.
You and I and many others have seen the truly share selling scheme. With every filing, you see the O/S go up sometimes by several hundred million. What do they offer as an excuse? They had to pay vedors, creditors, etc etc. The next filing it's the same thing - O/S increase by a few hundred million shares. Until one day the O/S is suddenly about 90,000 shares short of the A/S. Oops! Not a problem. The company simply increases the A/S again and here we go again! But the thing is, these companies could care less what the investors think - they go ahead and put the huge increases in their filings. I'll go back to the biggest stock fraud in history: SPNG. Those 2 guys stole $52,000,000 doing exactly what I just outlined. That's a share selling scam.
In the case of GRCU, they made early promises that up to now, they haven't kept. Bad mistake, but remember, early on they were probably all hyped up about the money they were going to make. Look at those other mmj companies! Look at their share prices zoom. Yep, no doubt they put the cart before the horse, but I believe that until evidence of a share selling scheme rears it's ugly head, that they are trying hard to make a go of this.
I have a suggestion, I-GLOW. We know how you feel. You've posted the same stuff at least a hundred times. Enough already. Why don't you just hang tight, wait it out and see what happens. If it is a share selling scheme, then you'll have your day. If it isn't, then it isn't.
Of course, I could be totally wrong about this. lol.
p.s. Yes, I already know what just one of my big faults is; I'm wayyyyy to long winded. I seem to have a hard time keeping my posts short. Sorry.
Anyway, have a great weekend! :)
AI
