InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 26
Posts 2016
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/11/2012

Re: asmarterwookie post# 213562

Monday, 03/30/2015 9:48:48 AM

Monday, March 30, 2015 9:48:48 AM

Post# of 345783

Honestly bid, if you find a post where any PPHM investor here said SK doesn't make mistakes I'll bow down to the haters of SK



Glad you asked Wookie, it is in the context of this statement right here that no matter what happens SK is not to blame. Also included my reponse to it so you get both sides of the argument. You are a bright guy and follow all the same posts on here that I do. You know the story line that gets pushed.

I don't seem to have the skill to explain to you the difference between a "result commitment" and and SK's "intention statement



So CP based on this statement you would have all of us believe that a CEO should only be judged on Intent, but never on results? Herein lies the fundamental problem that I continue to raise as an issue. Every other public company and their respective management is judged on results, not intent. When results differ dramatically from intent the result is low PPS. What are investors supposed to make investment decisions on ahead of time if the intent cannot be trusted to ever come to "fruition".

SK is fast loosing credibility by failing to have results match intent. Subsequently SK's apologists are likewise losing credibility as they try to convince other investors that the disconnect between intent & results is a positive or at the very least does not matter.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent CDMO News