Wrong, quote ""500 - 6 = 494 / 500 = .988 X 100 = 98.8% LOSS to the common shares. FACT. MATH REALITY" Huh..... old news... what makes you keep thinking people are holding at a 98.8% loss.....that is old old ACTC news..this is now OCAT and the past CEO's are long gone..
"???
What? OLD NEWS? The price TODAY is 6.17 CENTS split adjusted. Thus the 98% plus LOSS TO COMMON is reality, TODAY. Not "old news" as is falsely claimed. Nothing "old" about it at all?
It makes NO DIFFERENCE when one bought shares- that has zero bearing or effect on the hard reality that the commons shares, the company itself, as of today, RIGHT NOW is a 98% plus LOSER COMPANY. When one bought shares does not change that hard reality. The stock has never, ever, ever produced a ROI to shareholders/investors and not ONE CENT of positive cash flows, let alone ever even remotely a profit or dividend or any other form of return. Read their SEC filings on sunk capital and total losses since inception. FACTS, not "old" news??
"new management" has not had any effect to this point in altering the reality that this common stock has LOST 98% plus of it's value since it started trading- from $5 a share to now 6.17 CENTS when the R/S split is backed out.
Nothing "old" about today's 6.17 CENT split adjusted stock price and the near total loss to common shares that still exists to this day- despite numerous mgt changes over numerous years.
