ScripsAmerica Inc. (SCRCQ)

[coolerheadsprevail]

Bill Gates started out in a highly-educated family. But they were not programmers, not even engineers. Or technical people at all. He started out in his garage.

He had no experience in the sector either.

Sir Richard Branson

Estimated fortune: $5,364,000,000billion

Sector: Tourism/finance/media

Start up capital: $447

Branson epitomises the self-made entrepreneur. He started off creating a student magazine aged just 16, then in 1970, he founded a mail-order record company - within a year he had opened his first shop on London's Oxford Street – Virgin Records. Virgin has now become a brand which now covers everything from telecommunications to space tourism.

What sector experience did this 16 year old have?

Seriously? Comparing SCRC to blue chips again? You do realize that for every Bill Gates, there are literally millions of others who fail at starting up a business?

Don't get me wrong, I'm also speculating that SCRC could find its niche and do well in the long run, but to support any investment advice for others to "buy and hold, but do NOT sell or trade anything!" by telling folks that SCRC is a slam dunk lock is laughable and disingenious -- but as a self-disclosed financier of the toxic .05 PIPE stock that SCRC disclosed within its SEC filings, I can understand why you and your self-disclosed associate, the criminal homophobe JOSEPH ZAMPETTI, would want to find as many sheeple as possible to provide bid support so that y'all can liquidate. After all, that's a lot of sheeple that will be needed to support 22M shares getting dumped...

But, I digress... ...I'll play along here... ...so you want folks to believe that BS Schneiderman is a spitting image of Bill Gates? Well then let's not forget to tell the WHOLE story shall we? Specifically, Bill Gates (not to mention Steve Jobs and Larry Ellison and their ilk) were bona fide visionaries who developed market-disupting products. AND THEY WERE YOUNG ENOUGH TO SEE THEIR VISION THRU THE VERY ROUGH EARLY STAGES THAT TOOK MANY MANY YEARS TO GET THRU.

BS Schneiderman? He has no market-disrupting product. He is trying to squeeze SCRC onto the middleman gravy train as a wholesaler/distributor. Even compounding is not new and he is apparently having problems there as well. And RapiMed, if it ever launches, is not new as it is simply taking an already pre-existing formulation for acetamenophen. AND, HE IS A NEAR-OCTOGENERIAN WHO IS ALREADY BEYOND RETIREMENT AGE WHO LEGITIMATE TUTS WILL NOT BELIEVE CAN BE AROUND TO SEE SCRC THRU THE ROUGH YEARS, AND WHO LIKELY SEE HIM AS SIMPLY TRYING ONE FINAL ATTEMPT AT A CASH GRAB.

And, most importantly, visionary leaders such as Gates always make sure to surround themselves with those who ARE experts in their fields. BS Schneiderman? Let's just say that it is clear that neither the CFO or Corp Controller are fully competent based on the sloppy and conflicting data/disclosures that somehow made their way into official SEC filings. And as I stated, neither the Sales Mgr nor the Business Development Mgr have prior pharma experience either (not to mention that the Business Development Mgr is Adam Brosius, another non-disclosing promoter that was involved in the epic promotion of 2013)...

As I stated previously numerous times, my hope is that thru these investor conferences, one or more PE firms (not HF's) will see the potential of SCRC and buy into the company -- and then utilize its influence to clean house and bring in experienced Mgmt who have a PROVEN track record of taking startups to the next level.


And while we are on the subject of telling the whole story, if you are going to quote me, then it is telling that when you quoted the following comments I made back in NOV-2013...

I am not underwater on SCRC by any stretch. In fact, I rarely hold for long. The stock is very toxic with the never ending parade of convertibles and dilution. I have been swing trading this for months and it has been very predictable (and profitable!) to be honest with you.

However, even with stocks that I am long on, I refuse to cheerlead just for the sake of talking my book. I often post bearish comments on stocks I own if they are factual and warranted. Every company has warts, and true DD involves taking inventory of both the good and the bad.

...that the bolded/underlined sections above were manipulated out of the quote. In addition, these statements were made back when the original tranches of the 6M shares of 0.00 stock that JOEY Z and his criminal group received for pumping the stock were beginning to unlock, and at that time I had publicly stated many times (which I continue to state to this day) that folks NOT simply buy and hold but trade the predictable volatility in order to obtain as many free-rolling shares as possible to hold as long-term lotto tickets.