InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 26
Posts 2016
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/11/2012

Re: Protector post# 212926

Thursday, 03/26/2015 11:21:12 AM

Thursday, March 26, 2015 11:21:12 AM

Post# of 345950

And to PROVE that those old time all-in suffocating partnerships are NO GOOD for PPHM just this:



First, nobody ever said they have to be "all-in". That is your words and noone else's. I understand your rational for saying this. Problem I'm having recently (and taking a ton of heat for) is the message coming from our CEO in regards to partnering and shareholder value. The company, up until a few months ago, continued to talk about these old-time partnerhships. Remember our plan post sabatoge continued to be an Ex-US partner, while maintaining development rights in the US. We all applauded that until it did not happen in the timeframe laid out by the company. Then, as soon as it didn't happen, the language started to change to a storyline of "we never wanted that anyway".

I'm standing up and calling shenanigans. People keep asking why, with all of our potential and progress, are we still so low PPS. This is a HUGE reason why. Company publically states an objective to entice investors...then does not deliver. No way to spin that into a positive.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent CDMO News