I agree with steel800 and Holter, I've been following this message board posts for the last 9 mos.
====================================================================
There is every reason to question this deal when you look at the last 12 mos. of news and information released to the public. CIGW abandoned all fiduciary responsibility to the "majority" of their stock holders by focusing only the gain of the management group who approved this decision.
====================================================================
Who is the so-called "affiliate" of Vertical Bridge, who has yet to be named as far as I can find out. And why not "merge" with CIGW and remain in the public sector? The wireless sector has nothing but growth in front of it over the short and long haul. Stock growth in itself would pay back the Vertical Bridge purchase money.
Are there enough facts relative to CIGW management not acting in the best interest of their shareholders to show cause for a class action suit to put a hold on this deal?
Vertical Bridge might rethink it's purchase decision if it has to go into court and put all their "background research" and "communications" out in the public domain.
The following is taken from CIGW's press release:
"Vertical Bridge was founded in 2014 by Digital Bridge Holdings, LLC[color=red][/color] as well as certain key executives from Global Tower Partners, and is headquartered in Boca Raton[color=red][/color], Florida. For more information, please visit www.verticalbridge.com"
It can't be coincidence that a Boca Raton, FL[color=red][/color] co. hooked up with a Wellington, FL company in a deal that make no sense to anyone with a calculator, except for the few at the top who are making huge deposits into their bank accounts.
=======================================================================
=======================================================================
