Revolutionary Concepts Inc (fka REVO)

[Krysti]

Here's why there is no settlement conference.

The case docket shows that the Defendants have filed an application for dismissal of the Eyetalk365 infringement claim. Eyetalk365 must respond to this by April 2.

MOTION to Dismiss For Lack of Patentable Subject Matter Under 35 U.S.C. 101 by CPI Security Systems Inc.
Responses due by 4/2/2015

Source: Eyetalk365 v CPI Court Docket

The Defendants will not file for dismissal, and then agree to a settlement conference before Eyetalk365 files a response. That would be daft. It certainly wouldn't be a tactic in any playbook for defendants facing patent infringement claims.

So, at the very least, the defendants will wait for a response from Eyetalk365 before even considering a settlement conference.

This is a simple, and straightforward, reason why there is no evidence to support claims that the parties are involved in a settlement hearing.