InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 15
Posts 428
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/03/2013

Re: None

Tuesday, 03/24/2015 11:41:32 AM

Tuesday, March 24, 2015 11:41:32 AM

Post# of 91007
Why are we still asking whether the process works?

There's enough anecdotal evidence out there, posted by respected doctors in medical journals to support the validity of the extraction process and the benefits from using SVFCs (think Dr Khalpey in the American Journal of Medicine).

The bigger issue is the FDA input around patient safety and the 'minimal manipulation' debate.

The only thing I can ever remember seeing is around infections at injection sites (I'm an ex-military medic and I've seen a lot of these types of localized infections) which are generally as a result of poor cannulation or injection technique and skin cleanliness practices.

I can't ever remember reading about allergic reactions - why should they be, the SVFs come from the patient...

The patent discussions are a different issue but again, I've read the revised patent application material and it's a whole lot cleaner than the original submission, so fingers crossed...

Then there's the reactor - why even bother if there are issues with the efficacy of the SVFs???

I think the time is being taken to perfect the process and gain FDA agreement on and when the time is right, we'll hear something...
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.