Monday, March 23, 2015 5:46:18 PM
We'll have to agree to disagree on this one. With regard to the ONCS/Merck (non) partnership debate, there is no "opinion" about it. It is fact. There is no current partnership. I think it is important that fact be separated from opinion, especially with something like this as believing that the current relationship with a Merck is more than it really is gives shareholders false expectations. That leads to investor frustration and poor investment decisions.
On another note, it is nice to see more posts today acknowledging the true extent of the ONCS/Merck relationship.
Recent ONCSQ News
- Form SC 13G/A - Statement of acquisition of beneficial ownership by individuals: [Amend] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 02/13/2024 07:30:19 PM
Avant Technologies Equipping AI-Managed Data Center with High Performance Computing Systems • AVAI • May 10, 2024 8:00 AM
VAYK Discloses Strategic Conversation on Potential Acquisition of $4 Million Home Service Business • VAYK • May 9, 2024 9:00 AM
Bantec's Howco Awarded $4.19 Million Dollar U.S. Department of Defense Contract • BANT • May 8, 2024 10:00 AM
Element79 Gold Corp Successfully Closes Maverick Springs Option Agreement • ELEM • May 8, 2024 9:05 AM
Kona Gold Beverages, Inc. Achieves April Revenues Exceeding $586,000 • KGKG • May 8, 2024 8:30 AM
Epazz plans to spin off Galaxy Batteries Inc. • EPAZ • May 8, 2024 7:05 AM