InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,477.90
(
0.16%
)
US TECH 100
19,125.60
(
-0.26%
)
Dow Jones
39,127.80
(
0.04%
)
Brent Oil
84.21
(
-0.31%
)
Bitcoin
60,812.80
(
0.00%
)
Post# of 17377
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

swingingRichard

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 83
Posts 11733
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/19/2014

swingingRichard

Re: ED25 post# 9232

Friday, 03/20/2015 12:44:20 AM

Friday, March 20, 2015 12:44:20 AM

Post# of 17377
An engineer is likely not qualified to comment on SWET feasibility. You need a real physicist. I spoke with one of the physicists SWET brags about from Georgia Tech. IMO SWET is misleading people because this actual physicist distance himself quickly stating that he was only asked about one narrow aspect of the design.

The physics do not work out for SWET.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up