LOL - your post still stands...using big words doesn't help support what you originally said...
Now if you said "rarely", "most times" or even "almost never" I probably would not have even replied.
But you used "Never" and even in bold font (LOL), "Any" and "Always" and said that was a fact.
I quoted one example and one example was all that was needed to dispel your stated "fact".
I could have gone on and listed more (Evolution Petroleum Corp, Protalix BioTherapeutics, Ziopharm oncology, Vitalstream Holdings, etc.), but like I said listing only one company (company that completed a r/s while on the OTCBB that post r/s benefited shareholders) was all that was required.
Here are facts:
1. My post was not a technicality.
1. I am not embellishing anything. You actually embellished your argument because yours was the one that contained untruths.
2. There is no desperation in anything I have posted on the board. I have no hidden agenda. I am not a day trader, I am not a large shareholder in this company, I am not working for anyone else, etc. - so the daily/weekly swings mean nothing to me as I am not selling anything until the pps is at a level I believe it will get to.
I will post if I feel I can add value to the conversation or if I have a question I think someone on this board can answer or in response to something I do not believe to be factual.
Your statement wasn't factual so I replied to it...
