InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 264
Posts 35051
Boards Moderated 3
Alias Born 02/22/2005

Re: rolyas post# 19

Wednesday, 05/17/2006 9:29:03 PM

Wednesday, May 17, 2006 9:29:03 PM

Post# of 356
I spoke with a Matt who returned my call. I asked why the leases they are claiming in WY didn't show in BLM's database and he told me it was because they were under Wysak (another Moar co.). I checked under Wysak and could not find the lease under that name either. Not saying they don't exist but they're not showing on BLM's system which is up-to-date acccording to them. My interest with this began with FPPL. I wanted to find out how much acreage they had leases for and couldn't find any in WY for them which they claimed to have. Of the 11 leases they claimed I found 9. Of those 9, 3 were authorized and the other 6 were pending. I presented this info on the FPPL board and was not received well. I'm just stating what I found. Interpret it anyway you want. It is interesting though that WBRS, FPPL and WYSK all claim similar leases. WYSK has a board here if you want to check into this further.


“A fool and his money are soon parted.” ~Thomas Tusser