InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 376
Posts 17100
Boards Moderated 4
Alias Born 03/07/2014

Re: BluSkies post# 13996

Saturday, 03/07/2015 10:10:25 PM

Saturday, March 07, 2015 10:10:25 PM

Post# of 106839
Of course they (the defendants) will file/filed a "motion" to dismiss. Has or did it happen? No, not as of yet. It's law 101 basics. The defendants will always file numerous motions for dismissal.

Nothing new or meaningful about that IMO. It's done in every case, always.

Look at the date on that article link about the "motion to dismiss"- it's dated Jan 2015. Was the case "dismissed" or motion granted as of today, March 7th 2015? Doesn't look like it to me?

As stated, those "retained attorneys" for the remainder of Bioheart BOD members on that clerk of the court site, several of them were just filled in within about the past 2 weeks. As I checked that site a few weeks back and BOD member Ahn and at least one other Bioheart BOD member had no counsel listed or filled in on that chart (just blank, no attorney listed or "retained", now all are filled in as having "retained counsel")- maybe they were hoping for a quick dismissal and thus didn't sign-on or hire counsel immediately and it appears the "motion to dismiss" hasn't happened yet, and now it's heading into mid March. So perhaps that's why they've now fully "lawyered up" and retained counsel IMO.

Again, that link to that article about the defendants counsel saying they will seek to "dismiss" is from early January. It's old info.

https://www.clerk-17th-flcourts.org/Clerkwebsite/BCCOC2/OdysseyPA/CaseSummary.aspx?CaseID=7862332&hidSearchType=party_case&DisplayCitation=no&CaseNumber=CACE14021256&SearchType=