Saturday, March 07, 2015 12:48:07 AM
So far I think the points you make are closest to my own views:
1. The offering was probably based on a discount to the split price and yes, as such, was pretty reasonably priced.
2. Does appear the uplist was rushed through - so far this has not been adequately explained.
3. There could have been PR's explaining what was going to happen but for whatever reason these were not issued. I am guessing the offering could have been structured differently, allowing retail shareholders (i.e. us) to participate - again this has not been adequately explained.
4. We are now positioned quite well; on the NASDAQ the company will be taken much more seriously by players from all aspects of the investment industry. In addition we get greater accountability and scrutiny of the company.
Therefore in my view the jury is still out on whether "JN did the best he could in a given situation".
Mass Megawatts Announces $220,500 Debt Cancellation Agreement to Improve Financing and Sales of a New Product to be Announced on July 11 • MMMW • Jun 28, 2024 7:30 AM
VAYK Exited Caribbean Investments for $320,000 Profit • VAYK • Jun 27, 2024 9:00 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Successful Flotation Cell Test at Bishop Gold Mill, Inyo County, California • NBRI • Jun 27, 2024 9:00 AM
Branded Legacy, Inc. and Hemp Emu Announce Strategic Partnership to Enhance CBD Product Manufacturing • BLEG • Jun 27, 2024 8:30 AM
POET Wins "Best Optical AI Solution" in 2024 AI Breakthrough Awards Program • POET • Jun 26, 2024 10:09 AM
HealthLynked Promotes Bill Crupi to Chief Operating Officer • HLYK • Jun 26, 2024 8:00 AM