![](http://investorshub.advfn.com/images/default_ih_profile2_4848.jpg?cb=0)
Saturday, March 07, 2015 12:48:07 AM
So far I think the points you make are closest to my own views:
1. The offering was probably based on a discount to the split price and yes, as such, was pretty reasonably priced.
2. Does appear the uplist was rushed through - so far this has not been adequately explained.
3. There could have been PR's explaining what was going to happen but for whatever reason these were not issued. I am guessing the offering could have been structured differently, allowing retail shareholders (i.e. us) to participate - again this has not been adequately explained.
4. We are now positioned quite well; on the NASDAQ the company will be taken much more seriously by players from all aspects of the investment industry. In addition we get greater accountability and scrutiny of the company.
Therefore in my view the jury is still out on whether "JN did the best he could in a given situation".
Bantec's Howco Short Term Department of Defense Contract Wins Will Exceed $1,100,000 for the current Quarter • BANT • Jun 25, 2024 10:00 AM
ECGI Holdings Targets $9.7 Billion Equestrian Apparel Market with Allon Brand Launch • ECGI • Jun 25, 2024 8:36 AM
Avant Technologies Addresses Progress on AI Supercomputer-Driven Data Centers • AVAI • Jun 25, 2024 8:00 AM
Green Leaf Innovations, Inc. Expands International Presence with New Partnership in Dubai • GRLF • Jun 24, 2024 8:30 AM
Bemax Inc. Positions to Capitalize on Industry Growth with New Improved Quality of Mother's Touch® Disposable Diapers • BMXC • Jun 24, 2024 8:00 AM
Last Shot Hydration Drink Announced as Official Sponsor of Red River Athletic Conference • EQLB • Jun 20, 2024 2:38 PM