InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 7
Posts 250
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/29/2012

Re: Doo-man post# 73403

Saturday, 03/07/2015 12:21:25 AM

Saturday, March 07, 2015 12:21:25 AM

Post# of 79740
1. How could RW win his argument? He clearly took the money as a bonus, there is no denying that. He clearly did not get that authorized. He clearly paid off the secretary in some capacity. Even if RW does win - his shares will need to be retired which will only benefit shareholders.

2. What practices would those be? Revenue with no toxic debts? How does that outcome not benefit shareholders? 25% of the shares will be retired!!

3. Your most logical argument. I wouldn't put it out of question, but I have yet to see anything even point in that direction - aside from babble that is totally conjured out of absolutely nothing.

4. Exactly.

My point stands, whoever wins the case is really irrelevant as shareholders are going to benefit from either decision... 25% of the Shares are going to be retired.