Followers | 298 |
Posts | 29914 |
Boards Moderated | 4 |
Alias Born | 03/06/2012 |
Thursday, March 05, 2015 12:49:27 PM
The FDA is saying that it is being marketed as a drug on that website and not a nutritional product. That is the violation and the labeling isn't sufficient to be marketed as a drug.
This is the key sentence in that letter:
So based on that it is the websites marketing that is causing it to be in violation, not the label or the product itself.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/21/352
Avant Technologies Engages Wired4Tech to Evaluate the Performance of Next Generation AI Server Technology • AVAI • May 23, 2024 8:00 AM
Branded Legacy, Inc. Unveils Collaboration with Celebrity Tattoo Artist Kat Tat for New Tattoo Aftercare Product • BLEG • May 22, 2024 8:30 AM
"Defo's Morning Briefing" Set to Debut for "GreenliteTV" • GRNL • May 21, 2024 2:28 PM
North Bay Resources Announces 50/50 JV at Fran Gold Project, British Columbia; Initiates NI 43-101 Resources Estimate and Bulk Sample • NBRI • May 21, 2024 9:07 AM
Greenlite Ventures Inks Deal to Acquire No Limit Technology • GRNL • May 17, 2024 3:00 PM
Music Licensing, Inc. (OTC: SONG) Subsidiary Pro Music Rights Secures Final Judgment of $114,081.30 USD, Demonstrating Strength of Licensing Agreements • SONGD • May 17, 2024 11:00 AM