Followers | 298 |
Posts | 29914 |
Boards Moderated | 4 |
Alias Born | 03/06/2012 |
Wednesday, March 04, 2015 11:03:57 AM
doesn't say who filed it but it seems like Cannlabs is trying say they weren't properly served as a proof of service on Cannlabs was filed with the court. Just a guess as the motion to quash is not available for viewing at this time.
Also, did you notice the three additional defendants that were added in the amended complaint?
http://www.legalmatch.com/law-library/article/what-is-a-motion-to-quash.html
37-2014-00036039-CU-DF-CTL
case number
https://roa.sdcourt.ca.gov/roa/faces/SearchResults.xhtml
North Bay Resources Reports Assays up to >25% Mg, 0.1% Ni, 0.1% Cu, 0.01% Co, 0.3 ppm Pt at Tulameen Platinum Project, British Columbia • NBRI • May 29, 2024 9:03 AM
One World Products, Inc. Issues Shareholder Update • OWPC • May 29, 2024 8:20 AM
Green Leaf Innovations, Inc. Engages Olayinka Oyebola & Co for Two-Year Audit • GRLF • May 28, 2024 8:30 AM
HealthLynked Introduces AI-Powered Chat Function to Enhance Healthcare Accessibility • HLYK • May 28, 2024 8:00 AM
Avant Technologies Engages Wired4Tech to Evaluate the Performance of Next Generation AI Server Technology • AVAI • May 23, 2024 8:00 AM
Branded Legacy, Inc. Unveils Collaboration with Celebrity Tattoo Artist Kat Tat for New Tattoo Aftercare Product • BLEG • May 22, 2024 8:30 AM