Lets discuss IP for a bit.
Most investors want IP before they invest in a technology. Gartner doesn't have any IP. He is attempting to claim "trade secrets" as IP. If he had a patent application, he would be stating that so he does not have any patent IP.
The likelihood of Gartner obtaining investment money is the same probability of idiots having money to invest. The money is there but he just has to find the dumbest of the dumbest.
What about Radient? What IP do they have left.
DR70 is gone.
They have CIT and the humanized mouse both of which were written off as having no value by Radient. Radient has nothing left.
What about Provista?
Provista has an application on their BT test. The latest was filed in 2013 and there has been no detailed examination yet.
They have made two prior attempts to patent the BT test and both have received final rejection and have been abandoned. The first attempt was in 2006 and the second was in 2010.
The odds of the latest application being rejected in HIGH.
I have never shorted nor intend to have any financial interest in this stock. I am not connected with anyone who trades, shorts or has financial interests in this stock. I only post facts and my opinions. I do not post on IHUB with different aliases.
