Consumer Automotive Finance Inc (CAFI)

[EPROM]

arbpro writes: ""I guess the Dog and I are responsible for that too.""

Nope. All I'm pointing out is that the exact same thing Dog is accusing NowAuoto of doing ...he does himself! Why should anyone believe someone who openly LIES about an "investment security"?

Look, Dog got caught in a lie - plain & simple. ...and his reputation is now under suspicion just like he feels NowAuto's reputation should be for lying.

Unless, of course, you feel it's OKAY for someone to "lie" about NowAuto and then expect people to believe what is written by this person in the future??????????

Aren't you antiNAUG's suggesting that since NowAuto "lied" that they shouldn't be trusted? ....but we should trust Dog even though he has also "lied"?

...Okay for Dog to "lie"

...NOT okay for NowAuto to "lie".

I sure don't understand this strange form of reasoning?

EPROM