InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,321.41
(
0.25%
)
US TECH 100
18,206.80
(
-0.14%
)
Dow Jones
39,872.99
(
0.17%
)
Brent Oil
82.28
(
-0.21%
)
Bitcoin
70,217.55
(
0.12%
)
Post# of 17377
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

swingingRichard

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 83
Posts 11724
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/19/2014

swingingRichard

Re: Cycleman post# 8756

Saturday, 02/28/2015 7:57:03 PM

Saturday, February 28, 2015 7:57:03 PM

Post# of 17377
A better scale model (dry ice = hilarious) might involve controlling the air at the top of the tower (how high? 50 feet? 100?) and inject an air and water vapor mixture cooled to the projected temperature and see what happens.

It's all for nothing though. SWET's numbers, if they actually have any, do not add up.

And thinking back, concerning this 4 pages of formulas (logical fallacy there is "appeal to authority") I'd be curious to hear SWET's "4 pages of calculations" theorists, explain what Albert Einstein was using back in day.

High Priest of the Church of the Painful Truth. My opinions are my own. Do your own research.

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up