Tuesday, February 24, 2015 11:18:09 AM
I am aware of certain failed processes which have been used, even at Bourque Industries, to reproduce Kryron. If the correct protocol is not used failure will follow. Only a few at BORK knew the correct protocol. Others did not and wasted resources doing things incorrectly and not knowing it, and thusly produced an inferior material that failed some tests. I am not portraying myself as a Kryron expert. However over time I have learned a few things by carefully reading, listening, and observing. What I do know I currently consider the intellectual property of Bourque Industries, I therefore don't currently feel free to divulge it. I I do suspect that the failed reproductions may have lead to some bad test results. I have seen and handled material produced correctly and incorrectly, and knowing the general production concept and with some physics education, the difference in the results is observable. I have discussed what I have learned with some who are highly trained, experienced, and credentialized in the fields of physics and engineering and received concurring conclusions.
FEATURED NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM