InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 14
Posts 435
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/31/2014

Re: Auditor 1 post# 3440

Monday, 02/23/2015 1:57:16 PM

Monday, February 23, 2015 1:57:16 PM

Post# of 8579
Auditor1, there are a couple of ironies going on here. First, Cerp has proclaimed his ownership of 1.2 million shares, and as it happens, your own first post on this board mentioned that your ownership, at least at that time, had grown to that very same number of shares. (I would write that no one has ever seen you and Cerp together, but I've found that subtle humor doesn't generally translate well on discussion boards.)

Second, with greater seriousness, I'd like to bounce an idea off you. Malvern earlier in the day brought this into my mind when he was expressing his hope for some good news, and I was trying to picture what good news might look like. I guess we've all heard the saying that in the matter of an expected positive event with a company, one should buy on the rumor and sell on the news.

Let's assume that this old wisdom works "in reverse" as well that people sell on the rumor of a negative event, then buy when the event materializes. I would therefore wonder if in the matter of something intrinsically negative such as dilution, lots of folks have been selling on the rumor/possibility, and that a "real act" of dilution, especially not to a horrific extent whatever that might be, might actually bring investors into the stock.

Just curious, or as you wrote "Just saying..." Thanks, I'm interested in your thoughts.