InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 6
Posts 171
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/04/2014

Re: tonyo524 post# 8475

Saturday, 02/21/2015 12:01:36 PM

Saturday, February 21, 2015 12:01:36 PM

Post# of 26514
I don't disagree with your information on Patten Energy, and I would like to post it up. However since we still have no viable evidence that the ties between Patten Energy and IENG actually exist or that the alleged acquisition of said company have been conclusive, we should not be posting any information on Patten Energy to IENG summary board.

Once we get some evidence or public record that ties the companies together and says the acquisition was finalized, I would like to post your information on the contracts of Patten Energy. Metro seems to be a reliable source of information as far as I can tell now.

I think the ties between Patten Energy and IENG are the source of the argument right now. And since the only information we have of the alleged acquisition are what has been what was filed through SEC. Aside from that we have nothing. They have yet to still file their yearly with the SEC or any extension of the yearly filing.

So once again I don't think anyone has a problem with the information you are providing for Patten Energy. The issue is that the ties between the companies have yet to be proven to exist.