InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 32
Posts 9154
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/13/2011

Re: DiscernTruth post# 41842

Saturday, 02/14/2015 10:12:33 AM

Saturday, February 14, 2015 10:12:33 AM

Post# of 45504
pretty certain, the shares were issued to him two yrs before the reverse split and when issued no statement was made about being non-dilutive.
I think his shares along with EVERYBODY ELSE'S were reverse split.
Think about it, if they weren't affected by the split then when the split occurred he would have become a 10% owner of the entire company. Did he deserve this massive ownership position just for waiving interest on $500k loan? I don't think so.