Dsully, just my opinion, because any delay is a partial act of suicide. IMO.
Further, TSA will tell them much before TSA will approved the PR announcing it so they can know the outcome prior to the CC.
Irregardless, they need to clear up the doubt about wether an asteroid is going to hit us or wether we are going for a ride on one. We know what GB's strategic intent was= get gov. certs. to enable sales, get sales to enable an uplisting, build products that have legs, captialize on all of the above, sell the company when it hits $500M cap.
So if Dr. McGann has changed the direction the wagon is heading, IMO, he has to communicate what that is and how we will get there and what the milestones are along the way, while maintaining comp. secrecy and of course TSA's restrictions. But hey, they go to industry day events and every freaking competitor is taking notes...so its not the big deal it is sometimes made out to be.
Further, there are only so many ligitimate potential buyers out there, IMSC has them in their contact base and when anything good develops, those potential buyers find out about it, they call their rep or contact at S-M and ask about IMSC's this/that, then they get fed a line of BS that has slightly more "e-coli" in it than the worst lines we are fed. Why? Cuz the TSA is going to do whatever it feels like doing.
Analyst: how much of the $2M development grant from TSA do you expect to receive before June 30th, 2015?
BM: Competitive secrecy- hell, ALL OF IT!
AI
