InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 241
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/11/2014

Re: nealg post# 1648

Wednesday, 02/11/2015 1:39:22 AM

Wednesday, February 11, 2015 1:39:22 AM

Post# of 2353
You must have misunderstood my post because I have no problem with him and am sure he's good to have on the board. What I said was that I'd respect him more if he convinced the board to acknowledge their disaster of last Feb and bring in someone new. The point I would also make is that most board members sit in on the odd meeting but do little to advance the company. IHUB posters often get excited about the resumes of new board members but most of the time it's all for show or to impress potential investment funds. For Viscount for example there is no evidence that any board member has ever brought a closed deal to the table. From what I've heard Raefield, for all his supposedly impressive resume as an access control expert has not brought anything to the table from his rolodex either as a board member or as CEO. I could be wrong but the Viscount news releases say otherwise.

So, unless they become operational like Liskouski at IMSC they don't bring in business like some investors think. I also took at look at the IMSC board and read that he was also paid extra for some of his efforts which makes sense.