InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,460.48
(
-0.41%
)
US TECH 100
19,181.60
(
-0.43%
)
Dow Jones
39,118.86
(
-0.12%
)
Brent Oil
84.85
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
60,866.03
(
0.92%
)
Post# of 35337
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Torvecian

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 6
Posts 1715
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/21/2004

Torvecian

Re: dread50above post# 6114

Thursday, 05/11/2006 4:01:02 PM

Thursday, May 11, 2006 4:01:02 PM

Post# of 35337
IF that theory is correct....

My opinion is that we would see more balanced trading....of course, if an "event" occurs that creates demand for the shares, covering would ensue to close out that position, as well as new buyers taking the place of the low cost accumulator. I think the low cost accumulator steps aside and lets the new buyers complete their strategy by running it up....what a payday that could be for them.....

In that scenario, we all win, except what remaining short position had to be closed out under stampede conditions....



Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up