InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 1379
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/24/2004

Re: shadolane post# 21250

Saturday, 02/07/2015 1:39:09 PM

Saturday, February 07, 2015 1:39:09 PM

Post# of 97085
Opinions in this battle are a dime a dozen. The mediation has always been "contrived" by J&J. In early December J&J wanted a private mediation with their choice of the mediator imposed, probably some old guy who they have manipulated in the past. DECN declined. They even put out a news release explaining their position. By taking this position management faced the wrath of the short window shareholders. DECN instead offered off line discussions. J&J countered with a court administered mediation.

DECN's counter position to a court ordered mediation, detailed on December 16 at a hearing, was that any mediation was premature if held before their major case was heard. A premature mediation would be a compromise of DECN's position which was only now coming up in court. The judge ordered the mediation anyway. Then on December 19, 2014 J&J filed a letter to the court concerning their fraudulent witness. The mediation then became a perfect cover for that expert witness fraud.

In the meantime, DECN's lawyers will act like this is just the typical J&J slight of hand, and why not? Because companies that resort to parlor games and frauds on the court are not operating like this isn't a biggie for them.