I agree with you for the most part. If you re-read my post, I said they need to get rid of the toxic debt on their balance sheet and then uplist to the NASDAQ and then get back to expanding through aquisitions in that order. Where I disagree with you at is where you think they should take their time doing this. I am not advocating do it with reckless abandon, but I am saying time and speed are important in this situation. I read in another one of your post that you have run your own business for 21 years and I have no doubt that you have been very successful doing that. IMO running a small business takes a different mind set than running this company. Making sure your profitable before you grow and keeping debt to a minimum makes a ton of sense running a small business, but I am guessing you are not trying to become a world leader with your company, inside of a new and explosive sector like ECIG is. Sure, there will be more risk, but if they are successful, there will be much higher return. I don't think this management team came together with a vision other than being a dominant player in this space. If a r/s can get them to the NASDAQ quicker than IMO it makes sense. If it is being used for anything other than that, than it doesn't make sense IMO. I believe they will lay out their strategy when they feel the time is right, which is hopefully sooner than later. At that point investors will have a lot better understanding of the direction of the company and can decide for themselves if this is a stock they want to hold. Also, to answer your other questions, I did say in my first post that I own the stock and obviously I am not associated with the management team because if I was I would not be posting on this board.
AI
