Ray, you seem like a guy who is given to some reflection, so let me ask you something. If you were a top officer in a company and you believed that a reverse split of the common stock was desirable for some reason, would you subject yourself to the expense and aggravation of calling a meeting to bring it to a vote unless you thought the results were in the bag?
In fact, knowing the outcry that would inevitably ensue from your outraged shareholders, would you even broach the subject of a reverse split unless you believed the desired outcome was a lead-pipe cinch?
I sure wouldn't, and my instincts tell me ECIG's management wouldn't either. I know the numbers in 14a suggest that insiders did not control the vote at the time of the filing, but my gut tells me they do now or they will by March 10.
In other words, I think we're missing something. What it is I do not know.
