Followers | 3 |
Posts | 446 |
Boards Moderated | 0 |
Alias Born | 08/16/2005 |
Thursday, May 11, 2006 8:21:41 AM
I saw that as a rhetorical question . . . as in you were just stating a matter of fact from your own perspective. I didn't realize you were actually looking for some affirmation.
What is fair, here? That "Record Date" PR couldn't have been written any clearer -- you HAD to be a shareholder on record AS OF CLOSE OF TRADING ON MONDAY, MAY 1, 2006, to participate in the spin-off and receive a dividend.
As for doing things the "right" way: What is the "right" way? Whether a company chooses to follow the typical path or to take a path rarely taken does not define the appropriateness of that choice. It is an appropriate choice either way.
Now, however the NASD decides is another question entirely; either the NASD accepts the path as defined, or they reject that path and dictate a new one. In my opinion, the jury is still out on that one. We shall see in due time.
Been_Burned_Before
FEATURED North Bay Resources Announces Mt. Vernon Gold Mine Startup, Sierra County, California • Aug 5, 2024 9:00 AM
Fifty 1 Labs, Inc. and All-In-Extracts Announce Joint Venture to Develop and Release New Testosterone Boosting Supplement • BLEG • Aug 5, 2024 8:30 AM
Kona Gold Beverages, Inc. Announces Strategic Initiatives and Corporate Direction Changes • KGKG • Aug 2, 2024 2:00 PM
POET and Luxshare Tech Expand Product Offerings for Artificial Intelligence Networks • POET • Aug 1, 2024 9:28 AM
Management Discusses Financial Filings of Global Arena Holding Inc., for 10-K 2023 and 10-Q, 1st Quarter 2024 • GAHC • Aug 1, 2024 9:14 AM
VAYK Announces LOI to Acquire $1 Million Home Service Company to Support Airbnb Business • VAYK • Aug 1, 2024 9:00 AM