InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 14
Posts 489
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/22/2011

Re: TommyDe1 post# 33050

Wednesday, 02/04/2015 7:09:40 PM

Wednesday, February 04, 2015 7:09:40 PM

Post# of 42929
With ANAS, the float was only 58% of the O/S whereas with MNZO, the float is nearly 100% of the O/S. Other than that, both companies are designed from the same Ray Barton, pump and dump, template. ANAS also had loyal "'till death or bankruptcy do us part" shareholders, who said the CEO was an honest guy.

The bottom line is, selling pressure is keeping the price down and Ken Manzo hasn't given real investors any reason to buy and hold. The proof is in the share price. The Market is wickedly efficient when it comes to sniffing out B.S.

Tell the shareholders what your plan is, how long it will take, what it will cost and how you plan on paying for it? Simple, basic business stuff. Who's on the BOD and what are their qualifications? What are the terms of MNZO's deal with Celprogen? Who's Dean Frachino? If Ken Manzo doesn't want the Market to treat MNZO like it's a scam, he needs to stop acting like a "scammer". P.R. stands for Press Release, not Public Relations.

Ken Manzo wants you to drink his KoolAid but he refuses to reveal what's in it. Until he does, MNZO will never be more than what it is now.