InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 105
Posts 2892
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/16/2011

Re: ecommceo post# 216197

Wednesday, 02/04/2015 2:14:09 PM

Wednesday, February 04, 2015 2:14:09 PM

Post# of 263687
If you re-read my post, you'll see that it's an iterative process, sometimes with a rejection prior to approval.

According to the definition of patent pending, it would appear that at this stage, it actually is 'patent pending'.

If someone where to show proof that there was a final rejection issued, and there was zero chance for the patent to be granted, I would agree that representing the invention as 'patent pending' would be misleading, and improper.

Otherwise, it would seem that the only accurate classification for the filing, at this stage in the process, is 'patent pending'.

At the end of the day, its not pending. I feel that is what Old Tymer was getting at.



GRCU