InvestorsHub Logo

nyt

Followers 25
Posts 12715
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/29/2011

nyt

Re: Na$ty19 post# 24243

Tuesday, 02/03/2015 1:14:09 PM

Tuesday, February 03, 2015 1:14:09 PM

Post# of 130967
I know there are many companies in the LI business. I have posted that fact here more than once & posted links to some of them. Vplm IS in the business of LI because they have said they want to sell or licence it, so in order to do that, puts you in the business. But to truly be in the business, you have to actually make sales, or licencing & produce revenue. Vplm has not. I don't know if any of those others have or not, but from my research it appears to be a forgone conclusion they are.. It is very important, in my opinion, to establish whether or not the gov't, who has put the LI laws I to place, is using LI or not & if so, are they just freely using it or have they contracted w/anyone for it. Very important question because if the gov't is enforcing the CALEA laws, they would seemingly have to be doing so in conjunction w/the VoIP providers. Hence, they would be doing so either by right of law and freely or paying some kind of fee, one would naturally think, to get the "wiretapping" done when they want it. If they just get it done freely, by virtue of law, then that would seem to negate any value whatsoever, of the vplm LI, since such technology is by virtue of the law. And if they are paying for it, who are they paying & how is it accomplished w/o infringing on a patent that vplm has stated clearly, that there's no way around it (foundational)? Is that not THE CRUX of the matter?? (and the same all above goes for 911)
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent VPLM News