InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 16
Posts 2598
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/19/2010

Re: DJ Ponder post# 39984

Monday, 02/02/2015 6:02:26 PM

Monday, February 02, 2015 6:02:26 PM

Post# of 41960
ROFLMFAO....Well I'll Rely On The Intelligence Of

Smart shareholders, astute investors and like-minded individuals to make that determination for themselves.

1------

Prejudice usually enters in when the judge feels that the problems with the case are directly related to some sort of bad conduct. It may be that the entire action was brought in “bad faith,” which often means that there wasn’t really a legal problem at the root of the dispute. It may also be because of a lawyer’s poor conduct or inappropriate questioning, or some seriously flawed presentation of evidence. In any event, a judge won’t usually dismiss a case “with prejudice” unless he or she feels that the problems with the case are so intrinsic that the case can never be resolved, and as such it should never be able to be brought again. This is often designed both as a way to prevent the court’s time from being wasted in the future and also a means of punishing the party who caused the issues in the first place.




2----- Evidence shows judgement against ORRV was based on a lie.....the lie being that ORRV was complicit in the so called contract breach. That makes it a fraudulently based judgement and illegal in the eyes of the law. Feel free to check with a REAL AND LICENSED LAWYER to verify this FACT.


3------ I'm sure if he could have, the judge would have added twinkle lights and glitter to the decision in order to make sure the severely mentally challenged scumbag Darrell Nether got the point.

"An error does not become truth by reason of multiplied propagation, nor does truth become error because nobody sees it."
--- Gandhi