Just a comment on the SA article:
IMO, it's too bad it did not get wider distribution. Evidently, the link that was on this board was taken down--I could not find it again going back, though remember it stating at the bottom that it was a limited release (to SA members and elsewhere). Specifically, I am referring to the failure of outlets that usually publish it--such as the Yahoo board etc.
No argument that the world of Yahoo chat is a morass, especially compared to iHub, but has a significant audience. Personally, I had owned ELTP many years ago (over 10), either made (more likely lost) a small amount (I remember big wins and losses), and moved on, not looking back. What got my attention, and ultimately got me to buy back in, was in fact the serendipity of coming across the "swinging for the fences" article in SA. Following it up with DD, led me to this board, and ultimately, building up a substantial position (though many here own far more than myself). What bothers me is why it wasn't, per usual practice more widely distributed to public outlets like Yahoo, where more potential investors could be exposed especially given it was a follow-up to the first article, by the same author? Frankly, it was especially strong given the track record presented demonstrating follow-through since the first. Sure, eventually word will get out if/(when!) the ART approval(s) is successful, but for now, it's clear that what is really needed is fresh blood--something the company itself is not concerning itself with right now, but would be of benefit to all current investors, and especially important to supporting the s/p given the strong downtrend going on in the general market right now. Heck, it even convinced me to move a bit of cash around and pick up more this week though I'm already loaded to the gills.
At a minimum, is it possible for one of the board monitors to put a link up to it with the rest of the DD on this iHub page? Maybe both as a compare-and-contrast? If anyone is a member of SA (I declined as when I went to their site they required folks to "join" and thus I could only view the first two pages)--maybe contact them and see why it wasn't on Yahoo? IMO, I think we should make a concerted effort to get those that read Yahoo, RB, etc. to know about and come to this board--as it contains far more DD than posts from those other sites. Too much energy wasted fighting a few shorts with 20 handles, and less time getting the word out. More posts on Yahoo steering people here could be quite useful.
IMO: one of the reasons for our steady decline has been lack of visibility, especially as an OTC stock. No new blood = just us adding bits and pieces to our already big positions = not enough. Clearly, ELTP management is totally focused on getting out the filing and setting up the generic side; rightfully so. I personally will set up a new email box, join SA, and email them per the limited PR and try to get it spread, like on Yahoo and other sites...would help if more chimed in, as I'm sure the voice of one investor would be ignored. JMHO.
GLTA, even Seahawk fans...
Maz
