InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 105
Posts 2892
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/16/2011

Re: I-Glow post# 215672

Sunday, 02/01/2015 4:25:58 PM

Sunday, February 01, 2015 4:25:58 PM

Post# of 263697
Arthur Andersen was, at one time, one of the world's most dominant accounting/auditing firms. Due to their failure(s) (as Enron's primary auditor) with respect to Enron's books and records, they were forced to dissolve (and Andersen Consulting was subsequently re-branded to Accenture, to remove the stigma).

For decades prior to being dissolved, Arthur Andersen performed accounting/auditing services for many of the world's largest publicly traded corporations. More than a decade later, I have yet to see any negative shadow cast upon another former client of Arthur Andersen, simply because they happened to use that same accounting firm for their accounting/audit services.

Based upon this, it would seem a reasonable conclusion that the wrongful acts of a professional services firm (or individual) do not extend to other clients of that professional services firm (or individual).

Therefore, the supposed Green Cures/Richard Weed (opinion letter) issue is a non-issue.

As always, simply my opinion.

You wrote about Richard Weed being indicted:

So, the question is - do you agree with me 100% about GRCU using a attorney that has been indicted for writing fraudulent 144 opinion letters - that is pretty shady for GRCU to be involved with him?



GRCU