InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 24
Posts 3145
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/30/2009

Re: leifsmith post# 107741

Saturday, 01/31/2015 11:14:03 AM

Saturday, January 31, 2015 11:14:03 AM

Post# of 146201
I totally agree with that statement as it stands.

I have presented highly detailed and well supported argument why vaccines should get priority over drugs (and very clearly are by both WHO and CIDRAP (as evidenced by this document:

http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/sites/default/files/public/downloads/wellcome_trust-cidrap_ebola_vaccine_team_b_interim_report-final.pdf

Although disagreement has been expressed, no counter argument whatsoever has been presented.

As previously noted I closed out all my (small) position on NNVC last week and have only been "winding down" and "getting closure" here.

I'm done with this. I wish NNVC success: the technology has promise and the world really needs it if it works. But it is far less attractive to me than other investments for reasons already thoroughly discussed.

I truly hope that the stock does well and will be glad if it does. I will be making my money elsewhere but would in no way begrudge anyone making money on NNVC.

Different companies fit different investors approaches, risk profiles, preferences on management etc. It takes diversity to make almost anything viable.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NNVC News