AmeraMex International Inc. (AMMX)

[ForReal]

alien... MIK asked for proof. Semantics meaning, any kind of proof, seeing how we want to argue semantics here.

So, Marty gives kind of a sideways answer by saying she can't provide copies of contracts to the public or share holders. Again, notice the semantics.

Surely there is proof other than contracts and agreements, that would validate the premise of some type of agreement between AMMX and Niger. But, Marty was not willing to provide any of that.

So, without any verifiable proof of an agreement, other than the word of the company. We must rely on the history of the company, previous attempts and failures, and decide for ourselves, if this not just real, but if it is practical for us to believe that this deal will get done.

I hold shares of AMMX. I still have faith that it will get done. But, faith and trust are two separate things. Faith is given and trust is earned. Some prefer to act on faith (as I have) and others on trust (as Mik has).

We are each entitled to our opinions and investment strategies.
The argument here is whether one should use faith or trust, in accepting information disseminated by AMMX (or any other company).

Only time will tell. Arguing about semantics & faith and trust is fruitless. You have your way. He has his. But both of you should be permitted to voice your opinions without argument. You are defending your argument with as little hard evidence as you demand from Mik. And using semantics as the tool to try and discredit his opinion. He has shown you actual hard evidence for his opinion, on the other hand.