InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 21
Posts 14802
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/17/2003

Re: yourbankruptcy post# 6231

Friday, 06/13/2003 12:06:31 PM

Friday, June 13, 2003 12:06:31 PM

Post# of 97785
chipguy, why do you think A64 is more expensive to make than Barton? The amount of good dices per
vafer will be comparable, packaging comparable. Ok, let it be even 20% more expensive (I think it won't
be) - so what? Even 10% of sales increase will compensate 20% of cost rise.


Consider a 256 KB A64. It will be slightly larger in die size, it will have a smaller fraction of
die area protected by repairable redundant structures. And it uses SOI processing. The
package it goes into has more than 50% higher pin count. The high speed HT links will
increase testing costs. Finally, A64 is at the top of the learning curve while Barton is at
the bottom. I wouldn't be surprised if a 256 KB A64 cost as much as 50% more to make
than Barton in the first few quarters of full scale production. I doubt it would ever drop
below a 30% premium.

I really think AMD has painted themselves into a corner with A64 and SOI. For their sake I
hope they can pull A64 clock rates above 2.2 GHz with good yield or they are going to be
in a world of poop in the desktop market.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMD News