InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 7197
Next 10
Followers 91
Posts 10688
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/04/2006

Re: livemint post# 6872

Tuesday, 01/27/2015 11:36:52 AM

Tuesday, January 27, 2015 11:36:52 AM

Post# of 7197
The SF District Court case

did not involve Noveshen. He sued ECMH in New York. Some claim that he loaned coin to ECMH. It was part of his NIR finder fee when they funded ECMH. ECMH didn't even bother to respond in that one.

ECMH CEO Robins and Noveshen had a little "working relationship". Once Robins was ousted Noveshen was too. He sued and they ignored him.

"On June 16, 2006, we issued Envision Capital a one-year $110,000 promissory note. The note bears interest at 8% per annum. In connection with the loan, the Company issued Envision 400,000 five year warrants to purchase common stock at $.25 per share. The transaction was made pursuant to section 4(2) of the Securities Act and is exempt from registration."

"On July 1, 2006, we issued Envision Capital a one-year $30,000 promissory note. The note bears interest at 8% per annum. In connection with the loan, we issued Envision 175,000 five year warrants to purchase common stock at $.25 per share. The transaction was made pursuant to section 4(2) of the Securities Act and is exempt from registration."

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.