InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 11
Posts 1516
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/20/2014

Re: maeberly post# 20539

Thursday, 01/22/2015 3:51:13 PM

Thursday, January 22, 2015 3:51:13 PM

Post# of 47873
My sense, TSA should have said: NO NUCLEAR ETDs will be considered. As opposed to the weak-vague, Nuclear ETDs are NOT desired.

Sure, TSA is irritated. However, maintaining an "eco-system" of innovating, certified equipment providers is their first consideration so they take the irritation as part/parcel of that "eco-system".

At the end of this: GOA can say PROTEST UPHELD and TSA CAN SAY: NO WAY. TSA answers for national security, not the lawyers at the GOA. What is very very irritating to all concerned, when TSA writes solicitations, GOA lawyers review those solicitations and I would hope, bullet proof them. Thus, this is a grossly irritating strategic move by a loser. Hey, Morpho could not even keep employed the worst salesman in ETD. ( I gest of course)
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.