QS Energy Inc (QSEP)

[Zepellin]

>We know all the same things.

I beg to differ.

>the company and the major shareholders are somehow deliberately running a scam

Shareholders may not be, but may be reassured that shares they got at 25c are now at 45c. Still hard to lose out on it. However, I do think that lack of transparency from the company is difficult to justify.

>That's patently ridiculous.

It's not. Check out any other recent scam from 2008+ from much bigger organisations with much more stringent checks and far greater exposure. Madoff. Lehman Brothers. Barclays. Tescos.

>There are 100m+ shares held in very strong, longterm hands—how else do you think they forced out Cecil Kyte?

How do you know this? This would seem to be speculation.

>how else do you think they forced out Cecil Kyte?

They did? How so? Why? He was god's gift some months ago.

>Let's just be honest: this is a new technology. It went from lab to field test to commercial testing (now) quite quickly.

Er... no, its not *new*, STWA was formed to pursue this technology before smart phones. Maybe new-ish, but this is not "new"... There were other field tests before this, all, at best, producing muddy data. RMOTC has had doubts raised, China was silenced, TC has had some tests, results unknown.

>is a good sign to me.

As I said I wish you luck. But basically your speculating with little real evidence. For the impartial investor your commentary is not balanced.