Had to cheque my Portfolio to find out if I ever received Shares from this Company. But all the search did not give a positive Response. So they must have gone the wrong way or better said to the wrong place. But then I went into Meditation to bring my mind back to the period early 2013 and all the mind-searching as well did not give a positive result. So I am wondering then; if I did not have the privilege to know These People why on earth should they have given me something if they did not even give something to the dog-contest winner. Or is this some Kind of charity that Shares are distributed from the AAPT Management? Maybe E.G. made such favours but then it did not reach me.
But of course it is understandable that diverging opinions at the end of the day must have something to do with the Slogan, there is no free lunch? And as there is no free lunch, then of course if one get's hit, then the one being made responsible for gotten hit (just to have an excuse at home) must have no Moral and ethics. If then so, Wallstreet is full of it: Not all win and not all lose - like in the Casinos.
Finally your advise "going after him legally" I take such things on my easy shoulders as it seems your credo against everybody who does not beat the dead horse AAPT.
In a way of course I understand this reaction, because the beating of the dead horse has a leadership of ex employees, if I read all those texts well. But then my advise has to be: Why playing this game in a Forum and why not Show the face on public confronting your Darlings L and B. Would make more sense.
