ScripsAmerica Inc. (SCRCQ)

[coolerheadsprevail]

The 28 million shares you reference regardless of how you get there are no more. There are about <11 million pipe shares left, so why keep bringing up the 28million?

Because the holders of the 0.00 stock and the holders of the 0.05 PIPE stock are essentially the same. Picture a Venn diagram with a high degree of overlap. And it is important for newbies to understand the sharks that are swimming in the SCRC waters, in particular the magnitude and extent of their criminal behavior and financial conflicts of interest that remain to this day…

Why not also reference the notes that are now gone as well?

Because no other financier has been stupid and unethical enough to send a small army of its employees, lackeys, yes-men, and any other obedient lapdog it could find to flood public message boards with intentionally misleading and deceptive statements/information in an effort to stick their hands into the pockets of retail investors…

Also when you comment about the criminal joez and his core you do reference the core as pipe share holders in the same sentence. Sorry if I got confused by what you meant there and I'm glad I understand now YOU ARE NOT CALLING PIPE SHARE HOLDERS CRIMINALS. That is a big relief.

They are mentioned in the same sentence because many of the members of “column A” are also members of “column B”. Although many of the holders of the .05 PIPE stock are indeed the very same criminals who were disclosed by SCRC in its SEC filings as being part of JOSEPH ZAMPETTI’s core group of non-disclosing paid promoters, certainly NOT ALL OF THEM ARE…

You're misunderstanding what I'm saying about the pipe shares. I AM NOT TALKING ABOUT FREE SHARES mind you. A person who had pipes had about a .04-05 cent buffer from the share price. Does a person who bought at .10 also not have a buffer but an even better one at .10?

Sorry, but those who were doled out .05 shares have significant advantages and protection that those who only had the open market as their source of supply will never have. Spin it however you want. Everyone knows that it is about percentages and not specific cents – both in determining the level of support as well as in determining gains/losses.

People aren't getting screwed here.

Only financiers speak in such terms in defense of toxic financing deals. The only winners when toxic financing (or ANY financing that involves the issuance of deeply discounted stock, for that matter) is entered into are the financiers and the company. Shareholders ALWAYS lose.

Once again, just look at the periods in SCRC’s history where shareholders got burned by the sp suddenly cratering. There are only 5 such instances. And all 5 not only have JOSEPH ZAMPETTI and his core group of criminal securities-fraud-violators’ fingerprints all over them, but 3 of them are directly related to the reckless dumping of the massive tranches of the 28M shares of 0.00 and 0.05 PIPE stock that they were doled out.

“Real” shareholders have been and continue to be getting screwed by JOSEPH ZAMPETTI and his core group of securities-fraud-engaging criminal associates.

As I’ve stated before, the only market participants who would ever defend toxic dilution are those who are associated with the toxic dilution…

Yes it's too bad about the crash in July 2013 but that had nothing to do with the core group or Joe zampetti. In fact its been determined already how it happened.

LMAO… …I think I pulled a muscle in my side from laughing so hard. Please see the following sticky post:

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=108844507

In it you will see the following:

“On May 1, 2013, the Company issued 270,000 restricted shares of its stock to Joseph Zampetti (gasp! No way! Not JOEY Z!!! LOL…) for services to be rendered under a consulting agreement. These services were valued at $54,000.

On May 14, 2013, the Company issued 500,000 restricted shares of its common stock to Black Cat Consulting Inc. for investor relations consulting services. These services were valued at $110,000. (NOTE: Black Cat Consulting = Adam Brosius. Sound familiar? LOL…)

On June 6, 2013, the Company issued 490,000 restricted shares of its common stock to Joseph Zampetti and an aggregate of 260,000 restricted shares of its common stock to seven designees Mr. Zampetti, all of which were issued for services rendered by Mr. Zampetti under a consulting agreement. These services were valued at $165,000.

On June 20, 2013, the Company issued 200,000 restricted shares of its common stock to Joseph Zampetti and 25,000 restricted shares of its common stock to a designee Mr. Zampetti, all of which were issued for services rendered by Mr. Zampetti under a consulting agreement. These services were valued at $155,000.

On June 24, 2013, the Company issued 100,000 restricted shares of its common stock to Robert W. Tippin for services rendered under a consulting agreement with regard to investor relations services. These services were valued at $41,000.

On June 25, 2013, the Company issued 100,000 restricted shares of its common stock to Bruce Berenberg for services rendered under a consulting agreement with regard to investor relations services. These services were valued at $41,000.

On July 11, 2013, the Company issued 250,000 restricted shares of its common stock to Joseph Zampetti and 525,000 restricted shares of its common stock to a designee Mr. Zampetti, all of which were issued for services rendered by Mr. Zampetti under a consulting agreement. These services were valued at $751,750.

On July 11, 2013, the Company issued 150,000 restricted shares of its common stock to Bruce Berenberg for services rendered under a consulting agreement. These services were valued at $145,000.

On July 11, 2013, the Company issued 50,000 restricted shares of its common stock to Jon Van Wart for services rendered under a consulting agreement. These services were valued at $48,5000.

On July 11, 2013, the Company issued 25,000 restricted shares of its common stock to Michael Hon for services rendered under a consulting agreement. These services were valued at $24,250.

On July 15, 2013, the Company issued 10,000 restricted shares of its common stock to Jeffrey Supinsky for services rendered under a consulting agreement. These services were valued at $5,200.

On July 15, 2013, the Company issued 200,000 restricted shares of its common stock to LJMC Consulting LLC for services rendered under a consulting agreement. These services were valued at $104,000.

On July 15, 2013, the Company issued 150,000 restricted shares of its common stock to Jack Battagilia for services rendered under a consulting agreement. These services were valued at $78,000.

On July 15, 2013, the Company issued 75,000 restricted shares of its common stock to Randy Kopf for services rendered under a consulting agreement. These services were valued at $39,000.

On July 15, 2013, the Company issued 150,000 restricted shares of its common stock to Michael Hon for services rendered under a consulting agreement. These services were valued at $78,000.

On July 15, 2013, the Company issued 150,000 restricted shares of its common stock to Chase Fritz for services rendered under a consulting agreement. These services were valued at $78,000.

On July 15, 2013, the Company issued 400,000 restricted shares of its common stock to Bruce Berenberg for services rendered under a consulting agreement. These services were valued at $208,000.

On July 15, 2013, the Company issued 75,000 restricted shares of its common stock to Andrew Berenberg for services rendered under a consulting agreement. These services were valued at $39,000.

On August 13, 2013, the Company issued 26,373 restricted shares of its common stock to Hal Hall for services rendered under a consulting agreement. These services were valued at $9,750.

On August 16, 2013, the Company issued 1,153,000 restricted shares of its common stock tovarious consultants for investor relations and/or public relations services under consulting agreements, which services were valued at $355,530 (in the aggregate).

On October 7, 2013 and November 21, 2013, we issued an aggregate of 24,444 restricted shares of common stock to Nick Torrens under a consulting agreement with regard to public relations services. The shares were valued at $3,289.

On October 15, 2013, we issued an aggregate of 1,000,000 restricted shares of common stock to Black Cat Consulting, Inc. under a consulting agreement with regard to investor relations services. The shares were valued at $140,000.

On December 16, 2013, we issued 250,000 restricted shares of common stock to Sean Fitzgibbons under a consulting agreement with regard to investor relations services. These shares were valued at $32,500.

So that makes over 2 dozen named and un-named individuals and entities who had been compensated to promote or otherwise bring publicity to SCRC. And nary a single solitary Section 17(b)-compliant disclosure from amongst the lot of them in spite of literally tens of thousands of public touts and other documented communications from these individuals soliciting new investors to buy and hold SCRC stock.

And there is plenty of documented evidence that exists that clearly connects the dots between these individuals and their online aliases. Many retail investors who are regulars here in pennyland know very well who JOSEPH ZAMPETTI, BLACK CAT CONSULTING (aka ADAM BROSIUS), SEAN FITZGIBBONS, BRUCE BERENBERG, ROBERT TIPPEN, JEFF SUPINSKY, MICHAEL HON, CHASE FRITZ, and the other named “consultants” are. And all this documentation (which, unfortunately cannot be posted here due to violations of the TOS, but rest assured the SEC and other regulatory/enforcement agencies have no such TOS restrictions and have been provided with everything) is separate from and in addition to the fact that in other venues in the public space, JOSEPH ZAMPETTI has actually self-disclosed his identity vis-a-vis his alias.

So we see that CEO Bob personally authorized payment in excess of 6M shares of 0.00 cost restricted stock (not to mention a blow of $2.5M-$3M against the bottom line) to good ol' JOEY Z and a small army of both named core associates as well as additional un-named core “designees”.

For JOEY Z specifically, it started with an advance down payment on 5/1/13 for services "to be rendered", followed up by 2 progress payments on 6/6/13 and 6/20/13 as the promotional work began, and culminated with a final payment on 7/11/13, the day the promotions began dying down and the stock began its descent from $1.05 down to as low .08 exactly 3 months later.

In fact, SCRC was even noted by several financial sites as being under heavy promotion during this period.

"But how do we know who JOSEPH ZAMPETTI is and what consulting services he really provided to SCRC?"

Easy. You see, JOEY Z is quite infamous to those investors/traders who frequent pennyland. Without disclosing his alias, his countless MB posts (~1,300 re: SCRC in less than 3 months that all miraculously coincided with the payment timelines disclosed in the SEC filings!) and countless personal invitations to others inviting them to buy into SCRC during the exact period for which his compensation took place tells the tale of the nature of the "services" which JOEY Z provided to SCRC -- all in violation of securities regulations, specifically the lack of disclosure in compliance with Section 17(b) of the Securities Act of 1933.

And I’ll leave you with this one final tidbit: JOSEPH ZAMPETTI was banned from a very well-known investor message board for being a non-disclosing paid promoter. You think a high-profile MB is going to ban someone for this type of violation unless they saw clear-cut evidence of it???

Here endeth the lesson...

Are the people at .055 in a better position than .10? Sure. But aren't both making money?

That is quite the “Let them eat the crumbs of my cake that fall off the table” perspective, LOL…

About the China trip. It's unfair to pass something as fact when it's not proven just because the negative can't be proven.
This mb could get very misleading very quickly if that were the case. I like to work with facts personally, not insinuations.

Ummm, has RapiMed launched yet? Back during the P&D of 2013, part of the forward-looking statements and PR’s stated that not only was a sales team going to mainland China in JUL’13 to sign mega-deals with networks of “thousands” of retail outlets but that RapiMed would launch later that year by SEP’13.

Not only was there no typhoon back then but RapiMed obviously failed to launch as promised. The first of many “RapiMed will launch {insert date here}” promises that BS Schneiderman made – and which JOSEPH ZAMPETTI and his core group of criminals pumped to high heaven for their own personal benefit – which never materialized.

Here's to another day of strong trading. Can't wait for the January revenue numbers. Hoping for another 5 million plus this month.

Well for once we agree on something, pipe!