InvestorsHub Logo

nyt

Followers 26
Posts 12949
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/29/2011

nyt

Re: GreenBackClub post# 23965

Wednesday, 01/14/2015 2:24:40 AM

Wednesday, January 14, 2015 2:24:40 AM

Post# of 132873
"Connecting the dots...
VPLM, lawful intercept, mi5, Google
http://mobile.bloomberg.com/news/2015-01-13/clegg-resists-mi5-calls- for-snooping-powers-after-attacks.html?cmpid=yhoo
Certainly VPLM should be in this conversation given mi5 did the testing for lawful intercept..."
___________
You're right, they certainly SHOULD be.....so why AREN'T they?? That's the question. That they SHOULD, has been posed for a long time now... but they AREN'T, so why not?? It's not too far out for me to say that anti-terrorism is one of the top considerations in the world today, if not the number one. It also seems quite possible to me that vplm LI, as it's been presented to us and the rest of the world by the BOD, may very well be the absolute #1 tool with which to thwart terrorists, because w/o it (according to vplm & the pumpers) terrorists would have unfettered communications access to plot their evil. Obviously that, can never be allowed to be.. But with LI, (vplm, as presented) they would be never have that freedom to conspire. And also, that obviously means that the teleco's will individually, eventually be required to have this tool available to answer to the governments call. As we know its already a requirement to operate as a teleco, in numerous countries. So here's the thing.... that I've been saying in one way or another for a long time... I'm not gonna ask the question anymore as it's just downright ridiculous.. I'm categorically stating, in no uncertain terms...THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED AND ACTUAL SITUATUON CAN NOT POSSIBLY BE! ....along with the fact that vplm LI (or vplm itself) has not been acquired or been licenced (if indeed it IS as it's been touted to be...). I don't care what anybody says. It AIN'T POSSIBLE, no matter how you look at it, from whatever angle, along with all the excuses & explanations. It DOES NOT add up. It's (supposedly) too big, too important, too dire, too valuable, too needed et al. It just CAN NOT BE (as touted). The only way I would concede it to be even remotely POSSIBLE is if the name of vplm as the entity who owns the techno, and the ANSWER TO THIS NEAR #1 WORLD PROBLEM & NEED THAT CAN NOT & WILL NOT BE DENIED, was now a household name, well known to be THE HOLDER OF THE KEY!!!!!!! as a fight has gone on to determine who gets it. Except that doesn't seem too plausible, since any major player like MS, Google or Apple COULD HAVE HAD IT FOR A RELATIVE SONG BY NOW, compared to the wealth they have. I believe all above are INDISPUTEABLE FACTS.
.
Therefore there is only one possible answer as to why this has not come to fruition............

And that is that there must be a reality about vplm LI and/or the whole pkg, that, as hard as it is for some minds to accept the logic, it somehow is simply not what we have been led to believe, in one or more very important ways, and apparently, all those that would be concerned, esp the big dogs... KNOW THIS! that is the ONLY way to explain it. And it could be that someday soon the reason(s) will be revealed & it will be a bombshell dropped here. I sincerely hope I'm wrong but I cannot see how, in consideration of the above facts. Pure & simple. Sad but true.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent VPLM News