ScripsAmerica Inc. (SCRCQ)

[coolerheadsprevail]

Alleyba says............................

..................that it is his understanding that Zampetti is not allowed to post on this board

Go on now, tell the rest of the story… …oh wait, that would shine a negative light on JOEY Z though, so I get why you would cut your sentence off where you did. That’s OK, I’ll tell it for you:

”…Zampetti is not allowed to post on this board because he was banned for being a non-disclosing paid promoter”

otherwise, not only could he defend himself....he would have you taken down every time you attacked him which you as a moderator know as well as Alleyba.

Nope, not true whatsoever. Anyone who decides to make a deal with the devil and accept compensation from a company to promote it and gets his/her name plastered in the company’s SEC filings as a result of this compensation package is now a public figure. And to the extent that these public figures are still engaging in unethical behavior that impacts MY investment in SCRC, they are very much on topic for discussion.

Alleyba would go one step further if JZ knew who you really are he would not hesitate to take you to court for all the false accusations made against him.

Well then, he would lose, and all the world would then know exactly who his core group is and what they have done. Somehow I suspect that climbing out of the shadows and into the fullness of the light is the last thing that JOSEPH ZAMPETTI and his core group of criminal associates want to do…

If SCRC does start doing business in China then BS has delivered. End of story.

Uh, no. He has already failed to deliver on the specific promises he has made in the timelines for which he had promised delivery. You cannot unring those bells. Investors lost a lot of money because they had put their trust in him and the criminal promoters (yes, JOEY Z, this once again means YOU and your core group) he hired to pump SCRC stock.

The gibberish Alleyba refers to is the constant reference to the nickel shares. It is just getting old and too repetitive.

So you are suggesting that even though the holders of the .05 PIPE stock are still around posing as retail joes soliciting buyers, and that there are still over 10M shares of this toxic waste still lurking in the float, that are priced at the most toxic discounts ever in the history of SCRC – that this is “old news”??? Are you seriously suggesting that if YOU were looking into buying into a stock or contemplating whether to hold or when to trade, that YOU would not want to know that a quarter of the O/S count and 40% of the float is out there priced at a 75% discount relative to current open market prices??? Yeah sure…

As I’ve stated several times, it seems rather clear to me that the only market participants who would ever defend such dilution are the ones who HOLD the dilutive shares.

You just seem to ignore fact company now turning profit and as a shareholder do you not feel compelled to at least say something bullish on that issue?

Not at all. If you take a moment and cease with the whole “selective memory” bit, you will see that I have many many posts that extol the good things that SCRC has done and the progress they have made operationally. BUT, as a shareholder, I demand accountability and responsible stewardship of MY capital/equity. And to this end, I will continue to highlight both the good and the bad – no different than a parent teaching a child about right vs wrong and scolding them when they tell lies, cheat, steal, etc. You seem to have a problem with this?

With regard to posting the same thing over and over.....shareholders are capable of doing their own due diligence and do not need to hear the same stories over and over..they can go back to older posts.

Sure, but as I stated in my prior post, my posts are rarely made in a vacuum, but instead are responses to repeated attempts to spread mis-information. So are you saying that you are fine with the mis-information being repeatedly posted but disdain the efforts to clarify the mis-statements? I’ve offered several times to stop pressing people’s nuts deeper and deeper into the woodchipper if they ceased their unethical behavior. My offer still stands…

Alleyba maintains those had the guts to lend the company money deserve to make money. You would expect to receive interest os some form of compensation on any personal loan you might make. I do not believe you lend money not expecting a return.

Then JOSEPH ZAMPETTI and his core group (along with other close associates, LOL) should have simply extended a term loan for 24% interest. This would have represented an obscene interest rate that SCRC has already shown a willingness to pay to other term loan holders. I stand by my comments that this PIPE deal was completely unnecessary.

I cannot remember Zack’s ever covering a penny stock so there must be something they like

Zacks did not initiate coverage on their own. SCRC was profiled because Zacks was fed the analyst report from SeeThruEquity. If you recall, as part of the promotional package that STE offers to clients such as SCRC, STE discloses that they have agreements with organizations such as Zacks, ThomsonReuters, etc, to distribute their (STE’s) reports thru their (Zacks et al’s) distribution channels. I’m sure that if you went thru STE’s entire history of analyst reports (of which there were many of penny stock companies), you would likely find others that at one time or another made it into Zacks’ database.

now that BS stopped the paper what do you have to say?

What I’ve always said: BS did NOT stop the “paper”. He simply replaced convert notes with even more toxic .05 PIPE shares. Dilution is dilution regardless of the source. And as I have stated after each of the past 2 Q’s, the rate of “new” dilution has slowed, but it is still happening. But at least we are at the stage now where the new dilution being added to the books is LESS than the existing dilution getting flushed out of the overhang so we seem to finally be in a position to move the “net net dilution” number down. Just like if you are in a rowboat with a hole at the bottom, scooping out bucketfuls of water does you no good if it is simply being replaced by new water coming in from the hole. Until you plug the hole and stop new water from coming in, nothing will change.